Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. Mullins et al
as 6:2018cv00085
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Respondent:
Johnny Mullins and Michael Brown, .
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
McKay v. Accenture United States Seperation Benefits for Services Employees Plan, et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Risa Ann McKay
Defendant:
Accenture United States Seperation Benefits for Services Employees Plan and Accenture United States Seperation Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cooper v. Texas Workforce Commission et al
as 4:2013cv00314
Plaintiff:
Kim Evan Cooper
Defendant:
Texas Workforce Commission and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Parmar v. Texas Workforce Commission et al
as 4:2011cv00308
Plaintiff:
Karsan Parmar
Defendant:
Texas Workforce Commission and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trustees of the Texas Pipe Trades Health Benefit Fund et al v. Wallace
as 4:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Texas Pipe Trades Health Benefit Fund , Trustees of the U.A. Plumbers & Steamfitters 401(k) Retirement Plan of TX , Trustees of the Dallas-Fort Worth Sheet Metal Apprentice Fund and others
Defendant:
Walter M Wallace
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Trustees of the Texas Pipe Trades Health Benefit Fund et al v. Whatley et al
as 4:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Texas Pipe Trades Health Benefit Fund , Trustees of the U.A. Plumbers & Steamfitters 401(k) Retirement Plan of TX , Trustees of the Dallas-Fort Worth Sheet Metal Apprentice Fund and others
Defendant:
J Mark Whatley and Poly Sheet Metal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Hickson et al Vs. United States Postal Service
as 5:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Doyle Hickson, Rafael Campos, Michelle Ferguson and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
