Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. ZTE (USA), Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00308
Defendant:
ZTE (USA), Inc. and ZTE (TX), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc 2017, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MOBILE SYNERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv01223
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc, Coolpad Technologies, Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MOBILE SYNERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Corydoras Technologies, LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Corydoras Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation and ZTE USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Maxell, Ltd. v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
Maxell, Ltd.
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation and ZTE USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Proximity Sensors of Texas, LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 6:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Proximity Sensors of Texas, LLC
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
X-Mobile Technologies LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00696
Plaintiff:
X-Mobile Technologies LLC
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (TX), Inc. and ZTE (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fractus, S.A. v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00561
Plaintiff:
Fractus, S.A.
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc. and ZTE (TX), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SEVEN Networks, LLC v. ZTE (USA) Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
SEVEN Networks, LLC
Defendant:
ZTE (USA) Inc. and ZTE Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cypress Lake Software, Inc. v. ZTE (USA) Inc.
as 6:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Cypress Lake Software, Inc.
Defendant:
ZTE (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Deshodax LLC v. ZTE (USA), Inc.
as 5:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Deshodax LLC
Defendant:
ZTE (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
