Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Dhesi v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 4:2014cv00787
Plaintiff:
Ranjit Dhesi
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana and Patrick Ivan Navarrete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glover et al v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2014cv00698
Plaintiff:
Brian Glover and Paloma Glover
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Hattaway et al v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2014cv00697
Plaintiff:
David Hattaway and Sheila Hattaway
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eaglin et al v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2014cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jerry Eaglin and Devonda Eaglin
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana and Benjamin Tarquinio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pruitt v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 5:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Laneya Pruitt
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Marshall v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2014cv00671
Plaintiff:
Tammie Marshall
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Tenorio et al v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tenorio and Jose Cisneros
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannal v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Robert Cannal
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haire v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2014cv00514
Plaintiff:
Jason Haire
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brewer v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana, et al
as 4:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Brewer
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana and Chad Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
