General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Davis v. Wilson
as 4:2018cv00559
Petitioner: Michael A. Davis
Respondent: Warden Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Chandler et al
as 4:2017cv00474
Petitioner: Michael A. Davis
Respondent: Rodney W. Chandler, Waller, M.J. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Chandler, Warden F.C.I. Fort Worth
as 4:2016cv01091
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Chandler, Warden F.C.I. Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Chandler
as 4:2015cv00289
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Rodney Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Means We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00078
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Rodney W Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Chandler, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00439
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Rodney W Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Chandler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00088
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Randall Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00186
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv03939
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Michael Anthnoy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00619
Petitioner: Michael Anthony Davis
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?