Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Moore v. Nixon et al
as 5:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Terrance Moore
Defendant:
Barton A Nixon, Robert K Stevens, Leroy J Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Hatfield et al
as 7:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Timmy Edward Hatfield
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Brad Livingston, E Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. Kennedy et al
as 5:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Martin E Vinson
Defendant:
Eileen Kennedy, Dennis L Herron and Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamble v. Quarterman et al
as 3:2010cv00443
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Gamble
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, NFN Cook and NFN Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Danny Price
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Alfred A Benson, Richard Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Reed
Defendant:
United States of America, Nathaniel Quarterman, Edward Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stredic v. Cruz et al
as 2:2009cv00294
Plaintiff:
Louis B Stredic
Defendant:
NFN Cruz, NFN DeSoto, Response Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Quarterman et al
as 7:2009cv00186
Petitioner:
David Joyner
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, NFN Norwood, Roy Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Crayton v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 2:2009cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lee Crayton
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Executive Board of Pardons and Paroles, Gregg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv01525
Petitioner:
Steven Renard Johnson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
