Cases 21 - 30 of 242
Hairston v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2022cv02645
Plaintiff:
Doctor Hairston
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Wyatt v. Bell Mechanical Services LLC
as 3:2022cv02618
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J. Wyatt
Defendant:
Bell Mechanical Services, LLC and Bell Mechanical Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Huggans v. National Bankruptcy Services LLC
as 3:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
Robert Huggans
Defendant:
National Bankruptcy Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Malone v. Ecobat LLC
as 3:2022cv02394
Plaintiff:
Sean P. Malone and Sean P Malone
Defendant:
Ecobat, LLC and Ecobat LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rinchelle Jones v. Beacon Health Options Inc
as 3:2022cv01566
Plaintiff:
Lavita Dianne Rinchelle Jones
Defendant:
Beacon Health Options, Inc. and Beacon Health Options Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Mendiaz v. AutoZoners LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MENDIAZ
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC and AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
King v. International Paper Company
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
El-Ray King
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Nelson v. Cottonwood Financial Texas LLC
as 1:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tina Castle Nelson
Defendant:
Cottonwood Financial Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Nelson v. Cottonwood Financial Texas LLC
as 3:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Tina Castle Nelson
Defendant:
Cottonwood Financial Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Willis v. DCMM Rental One, Ltd.
as 4:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Matthew Willis
Defendant:
DCMM Rental One, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
