Cases 11 - 20 of 355
Rodriguez v Val Verde Detention Center, et al
as 6:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Julian Rodriguez, Jr
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Unnamed Government Agents, Val Verde Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Ibanez et al
as 5:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Martinez
Defendant:
John Ibanez, Luis Rodriguez, Chase Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrera v. Seaton et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge R Shane Seaton, Stan Parker, Hardy L Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Johnson
as 6:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jay Rodriguez
Defendant:
Danielle Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albarado v. Martinez et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Defendant:
Jerry Martinez, Jennifer Cozby, K Schiwart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Eugenio Lopez Rodriguez
Defendant:
K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00891
Petitioner:
Epifanio M. Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Hector Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America and F.J. Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez, Jr. v. USA
as 4:2023cv00695
Petitioner:
Fidel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
