Cases 21 - 30 of 175
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00207
Petitioner:
Clifford Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00205
Petitioner:
Clifford Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
Clifford Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00206
Petitioner:
Clifford Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Tracey Carr, Branden M. Casey, Debra Byars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Carr et al
as 4:2022cv00879
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Tracey Carr, Branden M. Casey, Debra Byars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. City of Grand Prairie et al
as 3:2022cv01489
Plaintiff:
Ronneall Jones
Defendant:
City of Grand Prairie, Sharocka Corbett, Steve Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Waddell et al
as 7:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Michael Waddell, Brice Byrd, FNU Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Tarrant County Jail Medical Staff
as 4:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Shackles D Clark
Defendant:
Tarrant County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Anderson et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Richards
Defendant:
Sgt NFN Anderson, Sgt NFN Clark, Sgt NFN Bail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
