Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Mendoza-Hernandez v. BOP
as 3:2014cv02859
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mendoza-Hernandez
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Hemline et al
as 4:2014cv00456
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Defendant:
Hemline and BOP Carswell FMC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Dixon et al
as 5:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Diaz Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kerry Dixon, BOP, Medical Department Giles Dalby C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzalde v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00206
Petitioner:
Jaime Patino Monzalde
Respondent:
United States of America, Director of BOP and Warden of the Giles Dalby C I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Soto v. Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00171
Petitioner:
Manuel Soto
Respondent:
David Justice, Director of BOP, Director of ICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bojorquez v. Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00172
Petitioner:
Bernardo Felix Bojorquez
Respondent:
David Justice, Director of BOP, Director of ICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chavez-Delgado v. Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00156
Petitioner:
Jesus Chavez-Delgado
Respondent:
FNU Justice, Director of BOP, U.S. District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vela-Becerra v. Mayer et al
as 1:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Vela-Becerra
Defendant:
FNU Mayer, Unknown, Director of Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. The United States BOP et al
as 4:2007cv00536
Petitioner:
Cheri Welch
Respondent:
The United States BOP, The United States Parole Commission and Ginny Van Buren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
