Cases 21 - 30 of 2,031
Davis v. Preston E. Smith Unit
as 5:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Preston E. Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Wells Fargo et al
as 4:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Xavier Davis
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. District Attorneys Office et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tyrone E. George
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office, Covarty Criminal/District Courts, Tarrant County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Donald Blaine Davis
Respondent:
Juan Garcia and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Gibson et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Defendant:
Kristen Gibson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Owens et al
as 3:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Blanton
Defendant:
Priscilla R Owens, Jennifer Elrod Walker, Edith Brown Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. USA
as 3:2022cv02783
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamont Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Beavers v. Dorsey Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Ryan Beavers
Defendant:
Lawrence F. Dorsey Jr., Bradley Kerr, Marcus Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02613
Petitioner:
Kevin Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. USA
as 4:2022cv01000
Petitioner:
Khayree Dewayne Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
