Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Mosley v. Livingston et al
as 2:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
Roy Leon Mosley
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, J Curtis McDuffie, Merle Houska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Thaler et al
as 2:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
William Boyd Pierce
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Bruce Zeller, John Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannan v. Griffin et al
as 4:2011cv00299
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Defendant:
Wesley Griffin, John Doe, I, Trooper Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitonyak v. Pierce et al
as 1:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Colton Pitonyak
Defendant:
Bill Pierce, Religious Practices Committee, Wallace Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon v. Daniel, et al
as 1:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ramon
Defendant:
Bill Pierce, Wallace Nelson, Jim Glen Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00408
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Pierce
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spence v. Nelson
as 1:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
James Clifford Spence
Defendant:
Mail System Coordinators Panel of TDCJ-CID (MSCP), Director's Review Committee, Wallace Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Tucker et al
as 5:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
David L Shaw
Defendant:
Terry Tucker, NFN Griffin, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Texas Depart of Criminal Justice System & Employees et al
as 2:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
David L Shaw
Defendant:
Texas Depart of Criminal Justice System & Employees, Brad Livingston, Brian Rodeen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv00187
Petitioner:
Pierce Leo Shannon
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley G Lappin, Rodney Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
