Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Curry v. USA
as 4:2013cv00500
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kim Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Padilla v. Currie et al
as 3:2013cv01360
Plaintiff:
Ismael H Padilla
Defendant:
C Currie, Eddie Baker, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Curry
Defendant:
Ron Smith, Rick White, David Vartian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saldana v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Federico Flores Saldana, Jr
Defendant:
E. C. Williams, Wade T Alexander, Jason Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv05136
Petitioner:
Aundraye Marcellas Curry
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibenyenwa v. Carrington et al
as 5:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Micheal Jerrial Ibenyenwa
Defendant:
Gloria J Carrington, Henry A Parker, Gary L Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarborough v. Evens et al
as 3:2012cv02720
Petitioner:
Owen James Yarborough
Respondent:
Lone Evens and Tim Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Texas Board of Pardons & Parloes Operations Programs
as 5:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
George T Barnes
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles Operations Programs
Respondent:
G. Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reyna v. Currie
as 6:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Reyna
Defendant:
Gary Currie, Doyle Hill and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Currie et al
as 5:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
G. Currie, NFN Druever and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
