Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Diaz v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00050
Petitioner: Benito Vasquez Diaz
Respondent: William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hyatt v. Diaz
as 5:2015cv00154
Plaintiff: Ellis Hyatt
Defendant: M Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00023
Petitioner: Agusten Diaz
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Diaz v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00200
Plaintiff: Jesus Manuel Diaz
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons and Senior Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00195
Petitioner: Sergio Diaz
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Diaz v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv04104
Petitioner: Yony Renea Diaz
Respondent: William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz-Hernandez v. Farquhar et al
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff: Jose Diaz-Hernandez
Defendant: John S Farquhar, James Dee, Patricia Caballero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Hernandez v. Farquhar et al
as 5:2014cv00126
Plaintiff: Jose Diaz-Hernandez
Defendant: John S Farquhar, James Dee, Patricia Caballero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Diaz v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 3:2014cv00510
Plaintiff: Pedro Garcia-Diaz
Defendant: U.S. Marshals Service, U.S. Attorney General and Immigration and Naturalization Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Aranda v. Diaz
as 1:2014cv00011
Plaintiff: Felipe Rodriguez-Aranda
Defendant: Tomas Diaz Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?