Cases 51 - 60 of 104
Evans v. Phommahaxay et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Julius Curtis Evans
Defendant:
M L Phommahaxay, Brad Livingston, Barry L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montenegro v. Evans et al
as 2:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jorge Montenegro
Defendant:
Quinten E. Evans, Ramon G. Long and Candance J. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00051
Petitioner:
John Mark Evans
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saunders v. Tarrant County Sheriff's Department Confinement Bureau Administration
as 4:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tremaine Saunders
Defendant:
Tarrant County Sheriff's Department Confinement Bureau Administration, Dee Anderson, Sheriff Tarrant County, Bob Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Carrieon et al
as 2:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
John Arick Coleman
Defendant:
Alfreda D Carrieon, Julie M Evans, Bryan W Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Abbott et al
as 3:2013cv01698
Petitioner:
Clyde Dale Evans
Respondent:
Greg Abbott and Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Abbott et al
as 4:2013cv00375
Petitioner:
Clyde Dale Evans
Respondent:
Greg Abbott and Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv00301
Petitioner:
Patrick Evans
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slate v. Chandler, Warden et al
as 4:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
Shawn Slate
Defendant:
Rodney A Chandler, Warden, Officer Mosely, SIS Lt Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Evans v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00021
Petitioner:
Lavelle Evans
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
