Cases 61 - 70 of 2,744
Junkert v. Navarro County Jail
as 3:2022cv02752
Plaintiff:
William Junkert
Defendant:
Navarro County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02748
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Hernandez v. Richards et al
as 5:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hernandez
Defendant:
Colin M Richards, E Sbar, K McClure-Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 3:2022cv02581
Plaintiff:
Marcus Choice Williams
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grizzle v. Texas Tech Medical Branch et al
as 5:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Texas Tech Medical Branch, Bryan Williams, Jim Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oates v. Bailey County Jail
as 5:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
William K Oates
Defendant:
Bailey County Federal Withholding Facility and Bailey County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker, Robert Andrews, Timothy Cone and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garms v. Giles et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jason Berna Garms
Defendant:
William Giles and Salado U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2022cv02421
Petitioner:
Joshua William Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02403
Petitioner:
William Thomas Carey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
