Cases 61 - 70 of 201
Carroll v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 2:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Howard Carroll and Howard Carroll, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Collier
as 3:2022cv01067
Petitioner:
Roy Earl Brown
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Collier
as 3:2022cv01066
Petitioner:
Roy Earl Brown
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Collier
as 3:2022cv01068
Petitioner:
Roy Earl Brown
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Collier
as 3:2022cv01069
Petitioner:
Roy Earl Brown
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Abbott et al
as 3:2022cv01038
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gerard Wallace
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Bryan Collier, Craig Walkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Collier et al
as 7:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cornelius Brown
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, A. Lozada, Cory Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parnell v. Collier - TDCJ Director et al
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Buddy T Parnell
Defendant:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director, Ronald Ivey, Clayton Straughan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Tora Lakeith Russell
Defendant:
Merissa Jackson, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castaneda v. Collier et al
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Francisco J Castaneda
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Adam R. Gonzalez, Joe Tovar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
