Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Welsh v. Diaz et al
as 5:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Misty Diaz, Chris Weston, Craig Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sander-Armstrong v. NBC Universal
as 2:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Cal Sander-Armstrong
Defendant:
NBC Universal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
Kathy Armstrong and Marian Armstrong
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sander-Armstrong v. Google Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cal Sander-Armstrong
Defendant:
Google Incorporated and Church of Latter Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lucero et al v. Caterpillar Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00207
Defendant:
GKN Armstrong Wheels, Inc., Caterpillar Inc., GKN North American Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Lucero and Whitnie Potts
Interpleader:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wood v. Wise County Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Royce Wood
Defendant:
Wise County Detention Center, Lank Akin, FNU Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaver v. Wise County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Dale Alan Beaver, Jr.
Defendant:
Wise County Jail, Wise County Sheriff's Office, Administrator Joseph Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. USA
as 3:2022cv00914
Petitioner:
Patricia B Armstrong
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mentel v. Armstrong
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Vincen Mentel
Defendant:
Rick Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruble v. Armstrong
as 2:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Ruble
Defendant:
Rick Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
