Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Robledo v. Leal et al
as 1:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Domingo Robledo
Defendant:
Richard G Leal, David D. Lofton, Ronald P. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo v. Livingston et al
as 1:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Domingo Robledo
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Wathen et al
as 7:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Garcia
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James E Anders, Charles J Vandra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guadalupe v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00220
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Castillo Guadalupe
Defendant:
Ronald P. Williams, Richard G. Leal, Calvin Rister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitchon v. Sims et al
as 7:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Patrick Pitchon
Defendant:
Lesley S Sims, Jason P. Williams, Robert Klusmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitchon v. Sims et al
as 7:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
Patrick Pitchon
Defendant:
Lesley S Sims, Jason P. Williams, Robert Klusmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitchon v. Sims et al
as 7:2010cv00175
Plaintiff:
Patrick Pitchon
Defendant:
Lesley S Sims, Jason P. Williams, Robert Klusmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Anderson et al
as 4:2010cv00771
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Dee Anderson, P Williams and Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitchon v. Sims et al
as 7:2010cv00145
Plaintiff:
Patrick Pitchon
Defendant:
Lesley S Sims, Robert Klusmeyer, Jason P. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgewater et al v. Double Diamond Inc et al
as 3:2009cv01758
Plaintiff:
Betty Bridgewater, Betty Bridgewater, Betty Bridgewater and others
Defendant:
Double Diamond-Delaware Inc, Double Diamond Inc, R Mike Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
