Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 858
Dobek v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 5:2024cv00182
Petitioner: Christopher Dobek
Respondent: Warden, FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arevalo-Morales v. Warden Humphrey
as 1:2024cv00127
Respondent: Warden Humphrey
Petitioner: Jesus Arevalo-Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02015
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00126
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Prince v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00742
Respondent: Warden Christopher Rivers
Petitioner: Clovis L. Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Santana-Cerano v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00740
Respondent: Ms. FNU Brown, Ms. FNU Rubella and Warden FNU Rule
Petitioner: Maribel Santana-Cerano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cadena v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00743
Respondent: Warden, FMC Carswell
Petitioner: April Cadena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Preetorius v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00727
Respondent: Mr. FNU Austin, Ms. FNU Rebella and Warden FNU Rule
Petitioner: Regina M. Preetorius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Blake v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00726
Respondent: Ms. FNU Rubella, Warden FNU Rule and Ms. FNU Brown
Petitioner: Faith Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Estrada v. Warden, FCI Danbury
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner: Leonela Estrada
Respondent: Warden, FCI Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?