Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Johnson v. David et al
as 2:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
G S David, Mark Roth and W Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. David et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
G S David, Mark Roth and W Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2014cv00123
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2014cv00028
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00268
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00215
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v Doctors and Merchants
as 4:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Doctors and Merchants Credit Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sephus v. Leal et al
as 1:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Ray Sephus
Defendant:
Richard Leal, Isaac Cooper, Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bass et al
as 2:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
J L Bass, F D Briant, Tamy R Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
