Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Cooper v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 3:2014cv02795
Plaintiff:
Jay Sandon Cooper
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon , Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC , John M. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowe et al v. Chesapeake Operating Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01863
Plaintiff:
Mary Ralph Lowe , Clayton Lowe Yost Maebius , Samantha Adelaide Yost Pace and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating Inc and Chesapeake Exploration LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Pace et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01964
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Pace and Ellen H. Pace
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International, Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pace v. National Freight, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01314
Plaintiff:
Michael Pace
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Pace v. CitiMortgage Inc
as 4:2012cv00582
Plaintiff:
Steven Pace
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pace v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00064
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Wilson/Phillips Holdings, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Pace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barker v. Fisher et al
as 3:2011cv02774
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker
Defendant:
NFN Fisher, NFN Butcher, NFN King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pace v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01609
Plaintiff:
Janice M. Pace
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barker v. The State of Texas
as 3:2011cv00531
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker
Defendant:
NFN Sizemore, D Pace, NFN Boulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pace v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Pace
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
