Cases 21 - 30 of 109,342
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Puentes v. USA
as 4:2024cv00527
Petitioner:
Jose Milton Puentes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hicks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Traylin Dashaun Hicks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stoll et al v. Heights Healthcare of Texas LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Michele Stoll and Heather Ezell
Defendant:
Heights Healthcare of Texas LLC doing business as White Rock Medical Center, NCP Management LLC, National Payroll Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Goad v. CL Specialty Construction LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Defendant:
Andrew Cody Lackey, CL Specialty Construction LLC and Cody Lackey
Plaintiff:
David Patrick Goad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Brewer v. Burns et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sheldon Brewer
Defendant:
William Burns et al
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Council v. Draftkings et al
as 3:2024cv01370
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Council and klcouncil
Defendant:
Draftkings, John Doe 1 and John 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
