Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Pierce v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00841
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Pierce
Special Master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. North Dallas Honey Company
as 3:2019cv00410
Defendant:
North Dallas Honey Company
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Pierce and Anish Dave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Southwest Correctional Medical Group et al
as 7:2019cv00008
Plaintiff:
Billy Lee Pierce
Defendant:
Kendra Perry, Southwest Correctional Medical Group, Rebecca Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00265
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pierce v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv02157
Petitioner:
Dennis Jerome Pierce
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valdez v. Herron et al
as 5:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Albert Valdez
Defendant:
Micah Tobe Herron and Jennifer Rhea Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Marshall et al v. MarOpCo Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03236
Plaintiff:
Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management LLC
Defendant:
MarOpCo Inc , Edwin K Hunter , Hunter Hunter & Sonnier LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lowrey v. Wisch et al
as 4:2016cv01045
Plaintiff:
Stephen Pierce Lowrey
Defendant:
Scott Wisch and Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trejo v. Janssen Pharmaceutical Products LP et al
as 2:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Trejo
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutical Products LP, Texas Department of Health and Human Services, Dana Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
