Cases 31 - 40 of 638
Kelly v. O'Daniel et al
as 7:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
David Allen Kelly
Defendant:
Patrick L. O'Daniel, Bryan Collier, Kevin B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berry v. American United Life Insurance
as 3:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Kelli Berry
Defendant:
American United Life Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Thorne v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Lance Thorne
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe and Alexus Montemayor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv02151
Petitioner:
George Wyatt, Jr
Respondent:
State of Texas, USA, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Homer v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Homer
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Moran et al
as 3:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Damien Moran, Crown Bullion Inc, Bright Future Financial LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as Oakhurst Metals and others
Receiver:
Kelly M Crawford
Meares v. Rowe, et al
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Meares
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Lubbock County Detention Center and Charles Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Zachius M Stevens
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Michael Aaron Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Young v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-1 and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
