Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Malone v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv00216
Petitioner:
Marvin L Malone
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malone v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv03447
Petitioner:
Paul Malone
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malone v. Obama et al
as 2:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
William Charles Malone
Defendant:
Barach Obama and Jacob Lew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2016cv01014
Petitioner:
Frederick Dewayne Malone
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malone v. M&M Diversified, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
M&M Diversified, Inc., Marc Buyers and Abee Buyers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Dock-Malone v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
Lisa Dock-Malone
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fortenberry v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Elmo Fortenberry
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Midland County Court, Midland County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hay v United Development Fund IV, et al
as 4:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Mark Hay
Defendant:
United Development Funding IV, UMT Services, Inc., UMTH General Services, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
Evans v. Greenlaw et al
as 3:2016cv00635
Plaintiff:
Richard Evans
Defendant:
Hollis M Greenlaw, Philip K Marshall, J Heath Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2016cv00087
Petitioner:
Frederick Dewayne Malone
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
