Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Halcomb et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01683
Plaintiff:
Maudine Halcomb and Otis Halcomb, Jr
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Crane et al
as 5:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
Otis Ray Jones and Danielle Nicole Licatino
Defendant:
Andrew Joseph Crane and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv00649
Petitioner:
Willie Otis Harris, Jr
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Otis Leather, LLC v. Top Flight Leather, LLC
as 5:2013cv00230
Plaintiff:
Otis Leather, LLC
Defendant:
Top Flight Leather, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Oti v. Green Oaks SCC, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00816
Plaintiff:
Chidiebere Sarah Oti
Defendant:
Green Oaks SCC, LLC, Mark McKenzie, John Heller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Merritt v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv03423
Petitioner:
Otis Merritt
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scruggs v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2012cv05082
Plaintiff:
Otis Scruggs
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bivins v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02930
Plaintiff:
Otis Bivins
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv01519
Plaintiff:
Patty Hampton and Otis Hampton, Jr
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Warden Associates et al
as 4:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Davis
Defendant:
Warden Associates and Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
