Cases 41 - 50 of 1,696
Bester v Bagby Elevator Company, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tommy Bester
Defendant:
Bagby Elevator Company, Inc, John Does 1, John Does 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Garrison v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
William Scott Garrison
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinton v. One Technologies LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brinton
Defendant:
One Technologies LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Francis v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guerra Vasquez v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Manuel Salvador Guerra Vasquez
Defendant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tae Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Guerra Quezada v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jorge Antonio Guerra Quezada
Defendant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tae Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Texas State Board of Dental Examiners
Defendant:
John Doe, DDS and John Doe
Intervenor:
Enterhealth Properties, LLC
Jackson v. John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O
as 7:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Deunverelle L. Jackson and Deunjerelle L. Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O, Katherine Rushing and Myriah Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
