Cases 71 - 80 of 830
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00982
Petitioner:
Eric Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Sheriff Brown
as 3:2022cv02408
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Gene Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Brown, Bill Hill and NFN Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2022cv02421
Petitioner:
Joshua William Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. Fort Worth Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Fort Worth Sheriff's Dept. and Fort Worth Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Tyson Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. Clay Cooley LLC
as 3:2022cv02113
Plaintiff:
Pierro Jackson
Defendant:
Clay Cooley LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stone et al v. Kemp et al
as 7:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Eddie Byrd and others
Respondent:
Brian Kemp, Jimmy S Smith and Georgia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2022xc02066
Plaintiff:
Britt Jackson
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jackson v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2022cv02072
Plaintiff:
Britt Jackson
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Gateway Buick GMC LLC, General Motors Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
