Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Beltran v. Leal et al
as 1:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jose O Beltran
Defendant:
Richard G Leal, Robert Hardin, Yolanda M Correll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Codman & Shurtleff Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01384
Plaintiff:
Joe Marion Franklin and Sandra Franklin
Defendant:
Codman & Shurtleff Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mendoza et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. et al
as 3:2011cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jose F Mendoza and Rosa Mendoza
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. , Federal National Mortgage Association , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comeaux v. Broom et al
as 2:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Arcade Joseph Comeaux, Jr
Defendant:
Jaron Broom, Jeremy Woodruff, Benjiman Gariepy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Blackburn et al
as 2:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Garrison
Defendant:
Charles (Butch) Blackburn, Cheryl Phillips, Chad Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eltayib v. Cornell Companies Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Abdel Eltayib
Defendant:
Cornell Companies Inc, GEO Group Inc, David Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2010cv02390
Plaintiff:
Mark Perez
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon v. Daniel, et al
as 1:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ramon
Defendant:
Bill Pierce, Wallace Nelson, Jim Glen Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Timothy Revell, et al
as 5:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Donny Ray Welch
Defendant:
Timothy Revell, Jane Doe, Dhirajlal Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Timothy Revell, et al
as 2:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Donny Ray Welch
Defendant:
Timothy Revell, Jane Doe, Dhirajlal Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
