Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Flores v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Flores
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Other:
Gregory M Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Molesi et al v. SAMB, PLLC et al
as 4:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Kalla Molesi, Selena Fowler, Michiyo Couch and others
Defendant:
SAMB, PLLC, Sapna Bindal and Sapan Bindal
Brown v. Fowler et al
as 7:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Aaron Brown
Defendant:
Dean Fowler, Lauren Parish, Lyle Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Fowler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Contreras v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Brooks W Barfield, Douglas R Woodburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. WWE Inc et al
as 3:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
David Adrian Smith
Defendant:
WWE Inc, Carol Riddick, Frank Riddick and others
Fowler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv02672
Petitioner:
Alan Patrick Fowler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fowler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv01192
Petitioner:
Alan Patrick Fowler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodden v. D & G Trucking Company Inc et al
as 3:2021cv01954
Plaintiff:
Cherish Rodden
Defendant:
Jermaine E Fowler and D & G Trucking Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
