Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jay Harrison and Gregory Harrison
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Tammy Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01415
Petitioner:
Joel Garcia Nunez
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyon v. Tovar
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Edward B Lyon, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, State Classification Committee TDCJ, Lynnette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Schiwart et al
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Tyrone La'Shawn Clay
Defendant:
Carl Schiwart, Jana Harrison, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sewell v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Larry Gene Sewell
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casares v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Valentine Casares
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, K Smith, Joesph Eastridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Collier
as 3:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bostice v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Bostice
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
