Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rollerson v. FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Braddic Deshaun Rollerson
Defendant:
FMC Fort Worth, Phil Sorrells, Counselor Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampkin v. Amonett et al
as 5:2021cv00270
Petitioner:
Esaw Lampkin
Respondent:
A Amonett, David Reed, FNU Mermea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spalding v. John Doe Camp Counselor
as 3:2020cv03262
Plaintiff:
David Lyman Spalding
Defendant:
John Doe Camp Counselor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Counselor ROLT
as 3:2020cv00360
Plaintiff:
Guy Leonard, Jr
Defendant:
Counselor ROLT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hawk et al
as 4:2019cv01026
Plaintiff:
Priscilla A Ellis
Defendant:
Patrick Scruggs, Warden Jody Upton, Lisa Cole-Rowls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Robert Molina
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hallman v. Steve Gordon and Associates Attorneys and Counselors at Law et al
as 4:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
Steve Gordon and Associates Attorneys and Counselors at Law, Leticia Martinez and Honorable Judge Elizabeth Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drones v. Disciplinary Captain et al
as 2:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jesse Drones
Defendant:
Disciplinary Captain, Counselor Substitutes, TDCJ Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drones v. Chatelain et al
as 1:2014cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Drones
Defendant:
A Chatelain, Disciplinary Captains and Disciplinary Counselors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otero v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Omar Rascon Otero
Defendant:
N Ortiz, V Juarez, L Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
