Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marco A. Ramirez et al
as 7:2013cv00531
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Marco A. Ramirez , Bebe Ramirez , USA Now, LLC and others
Receiver:
Eduardo Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Moreno v. Ramirez et al
as 7:2013mc01106
Plaintiff:
Valentin Moreno, Jr.
Defendant:
Mario E. Ramirez and Rene Guerra
In Re Saida Lizeth Nunez Ramirez
as 7:2013mc00746
Petitioner:
Saida Lizeth Nunez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Zarate vs Community Action Council of South Texas et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 7:11-CV-210
as 7:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Francisco G. Zarate
Defendant:
Community Action Council of South Texas , Bob Alderman , Tirso Amesquita and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
BFI Waste Services of Texas, L.P. v. City of Edcouch, Texas et al
as 4:2012cv03670
Plaintiff:
BFI Waste Services of Texas, L.P.
Defendant:
City of Edcouch, Texas, Robert S. Schmalzried, Eddy Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
BFI Waste Services of Texas, L.P. v. City of Edcouch, Texas, et al
as 7:2012cv00521
Plaintiff:
BFI Waste Services of Texas, L.P.
Defendant:
City of Edcouch, Texas , Robert S. Schmalzried, Eddy Gonzalez and others
Counter_claimant:
City of Edcouch, Texas
Counter_defendant:
BFI Waste Services of Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Camara v. Montonati
as 4:2012mc00502
Plaintiff:
Pablo Carlos Ramirez Camara
Defendant:
Araceli Montonati
Smith et al v. Fort Hood National Bank et al
as 7:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Rickey Allan Smith , Nathan Vaught , Jesus Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Fort Hood National Bank, First National Bank of Texas d/b/a First Convenience Bank, FCBI Delaware, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. Power Plus Personnel.
as 4:2012mc00311
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ramirez
Defendant:
Power Plus Personnel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
