Cases 41 - 50 of 130
Sysco Corporation v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00169
Plaintiff:
Sysco Corporation
Defendant:
Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Starkist Company, Dongwon Industries Co. Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Renobato v. Bureau of the Fiscal Service
as 4:2017cv03904
Plaintiff:
Jay Nolan Renobato
Defendant:
Bureau of the Fiscal Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rueckert v. Zaappaaz, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03607
Plaintiff:
Klaire Rueckert
Defendant:
Zaappaaz, Inc., Azim Makanojiya, Custom Wristbands Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC v. Visa Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC
Defendant:
Visa Inc, MasterCard Incorporated, Barclays Bank of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Benchmark Electronics, Inc. et al v. Panasonic Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv01219
Plaintiff:
Benchmark Electronics Huntsville, Inc., Benchmark Electronics Tijuana, S. de R.L. de C.V., Benchmark Electronics, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nichicon Corporation, Shizuki Electric Co., Ltd., Shinyei Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Sureshot Golf Ventures, Inc. v. Topgolf International, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00127
Defendant:
SureShot Golf Ventures, Inc. and Topgolf International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Mahoney v. $200,000,000.00
as 4:2016cv03216
Plaintiff:
Rory Kay Mahoney
Defendant:
$200,000,000.00
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Swink v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01092
Plaintiff:
Ryan Swink
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Travis Kalanick
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Emmott v. Englehart
as 4:2016cv01780
Plaintiff:
Michael Emmott
Defendant:
Michael Englehart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA et al
as 3:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC and Autohaus LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
