Cases 1 - 10 of 10,997
Busby v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv02133
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Schmoker
as 4:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
James Richards
Defendant:
Wayne Schmoker and Executive Director of the Texas Civil Commitment Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arellano v. Collier
as 4:2024cv02116
Petitioner:
Wilberto Arellano
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02126
Petitioner:
James Burchard Simpson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Jorge Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas- Tyler.
as 4:2024cv01950
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salinas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01917
Petitioner:
John Thomas Salinas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Petitioner:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shepard v. Brazos County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv01913
Petitioner:
Tyrone Radale Shepard
Respondent:
Brazos County Sheriff Department and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
