Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
State of Texas v. Mayorkas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00001
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant: Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Department of Homeland Security, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
RAG Process, LLC v. Garland et al
as 4:2021cv04048
Plaintiff: RAG Process, LLC
Defendant: Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
State of Missouri et al v. Biden et al
as 6:2021cv00052
Plaintiff: State of Missouri and State Of Texas
Defendant: Joseph R Biden, Jr, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
City of Laredo v. The United States of America, et al.
as 5:2021cv00072
Plaintiff: CITY OF LAREDO
Defendant: The UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; U.S. CUSTO, The United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The General Land Office of the State of Texas et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00272
Plaintiff: The General Land Office of the State of Texas and Commissioner George P Bush
Defendant: President Joseph R. Biden, United States Department of Homeland Security and Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas
Consolidated Plaintiff: State of Missouri and State Of Texas
Consolidated Defendant: United States Of America, Troy A. Miller and United States Customs and Border Protection
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00016
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Tracy Renaud, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in her official capacity, Troy Miller, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana and State of Texas
Amicus Curiae: FIEL Houston, Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, David Pekoske, Troy Miller and others
Plaintiff: State of Texas
Amicus Curiae: ACLU Foundation of Texas, Inc., State of New York, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Petitioner: William F. Reade, Jr.
Intervenor: FIEL Houston and Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Vargas et al v. Sessions et al
as 4:2018cv02531
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Tony Bryson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff: Angela Maria Vargas and Isabel Gomez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Rasheed v. United States Department of Homeland Security (USDHS) et al
as 4:2018cv01672
Petitioner: Saba Ali Mohamed Rasheed
Respondent: United States Department of Homeland Security (USDHS), Kirstjen M Nielson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gandhi et al v. Lynch et al
as 4:2016cv01037
Plaintiff: Sue Gandhi and Ketanbahen Mody
Defendant: Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Tony Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?