Cases 101 - 110 of 1,117
Cochran v. Partch et al
as 2:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Cochran
Defendant:
Evan Partch, Kenneth Lecesue, Esther Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeomans v. Valdez et al
as 2:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Yeomans
Defendant:
Peace Officer John Valdez and John Valdez Supervising Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Davis et al
as 4:2022cv03205
Plaintiff:
Garyoine L. Dorsey
Defendant:
Davis and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shell v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2022cv03190
Plaintiff:
Robert Noble Shell
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Dr. John (or Jane) Doe, John (or Jane) Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montiel v. Telford Unit Officials
as 4:2022cv03197
Plaintiff:
Reymundo Montiel
Defendant:
Telford Unit Officials, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. 179th Court et al
as 4:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Willard Shaw
Defendant:
179th Court and John Flennety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Lumpkin
as 2:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
John F Hawkins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03012
Plaintiff:
John Lee Vaughn
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vallair v. Norsworthy et al
as 4:2022cv03004
Plaintiff:
John August Vallair
Defendant:
Sen. Warden Christopher Norsworthy and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Hellerstedt et al
as 3:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Roberts
Defendant:
John Hellerstedt, Sheriff Brian C Hawthorne and Todd E Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
