Cases 121 - 130 of 27,394
Elizondo v. State Judge of the 38th District Court et al
as 7:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jaime Elizondo
Defendant:
State Judge of the 38th District Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. Tillman et al
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Clifford Boyce
Defendant:
Officer Tillman, Officer Jaramillo and Sgt. Kessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01754
Petitioner:
Robert Cor'Darius Taylor
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathews v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01755
Petitioner:
Mike Naoyuki Mathews
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Texas City Police Officer et al
as 4:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stewart
Defendant:
Texas City Police Oficer and Texas City Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Warden Washington et al
as 4:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Warden Washington and O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valier v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Nkrumeh Lumumbavalier
Defendant:
The State of Texas and Kim K. Ogg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giagnacovo v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01162
Petitioner:
Hector Giagnacovo
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. Jerald K. Graber et al
as 4:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Carl W. Robertson
Defendant:
Jerald K. Graber, Terry Gaiser and Hazel B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
