Cases 11 - 20 of 164
Adams v. MO D.O.C. Corizon/Centurion
as 4:2023cv03537
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lyn Adams
Defendant:
MO D.O.C. Corizon and MO D.O.C. Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Harris County Court System
as 4:2023cv03370
Plaintiff:
Marcus Edward Adams
Defendant:
Harris County Court System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crapo v. City of Brownsville et al
as 1:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Adam Scott Crapo
Respondent:
City of Brownsville and Cameron County, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Asst Warden Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Joe Adam Ramirez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Joe Adam Ramirez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. Unknown
as 4:2023cv01529
Plaintiff:
Jamie Alan Adams
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01437
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Texas Board of Pardons
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxwell v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Alan Maxwell
Defendant:
Carmella Jones, Michael Adams and Jaqueline Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Law Library McConnell Unit, Central Grievance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
