Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Shaw v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2015cv00631
Petitioner: Eddie Tyron Shaw
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ahmadi v. Pool et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00302
Plaintiff: Bob Ahmadi
Defendant: Chris Pool, Mary Maggie, Debra Emmite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv01384
Petitioner: John Shaw
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawley v. Landsey, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv01918
Plaintiff: James Hawley
Defendant: Floyd A Landsey, Inc. and Ethan L Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Thaler
as 3:2013cv00072
Petitioner: Melvin Shaw
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Okorie et al
as 4:2012cv03097
Plaintiff: Johnathan Hunt
Defendant: James Okorie and Vickie Shaw-Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shaw v. Commassy Department Indigent Supply
as 4:2011cv02884
Plaintiff: Lloyd Willard Shaw
Defendant: Commassy Department Indigent Supply
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Metro Private Transportation Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv02756
Plaintiff: Lloyd Willard Shaw
Defendant: Metro Private Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice- Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID) et al
as 4:2011cv01448
Plaintiff: Oscar L Shaw
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice- Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID), Rick Thaler, David Sweetin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Sweetin et al
as 4:2011cv00375
Plaintiff: Melvin Shaw
Defendant: David Sweetin, D. Reed, Co. and Sgt. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?