Cases 11 - 20 of 27,373
Silvas v. Ltx. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Julian Galvan Silvas
Defendant:
Ltx. Brown, Sgt. Perez, Corporal Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00220
Petitioner:
Cristobal Bazan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
as 4:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Jaime Elizondo
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ:
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Vedal A Davis
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Anthony Newton and Gynna Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Chief Roy Finner et al
as 4:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
James Edward Hicks
Defendant:
Chief Roy Finner, J. Torres and K9 Dog and Handler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
