Cases 21 - 30 of 248
Stewart v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Scott Alexander Stewart
Defendant:
Harris County and Houston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. The United States of America
as 4:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Marquese Machea Scott
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dowell v. Kobayashi et al
as 4:2022cv04486
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Dowell
Defendant:
Warden H. Kobayashi and Troy Dorett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03519
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Jordan
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00123
Petitioner:
Roberto Scott Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Zirus et al v. Religious Practice Committee et al
as 4:2022cv02858
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus, David Martin, Konchok Tingdzin Wangyal and others
Defendant:
Religious Practice Committee, Timothy Jones, Thomas Brouwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. United States et al
as 4:2022cv02286
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
United States and Scott Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Behling v. Three Warden Staff
as 4:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Scott T. Behling
Defendant:
Three Warden Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holcomb v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01239
Petitioner:
David Scott Holcomb
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shafer v. Sanchez
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Shafer
Defendant:
Senior Warden Jerry Sanchez, TDCJ Executive Director, Officer Zamez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
