Cases 31 - 40 of 347
Cochran v. Partch et al
as 2:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Cochran
Defendant:
Evan Partch, Kenneth Lecesue, Esther Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2022cv03451
Plaintiff:
Roy Thompson
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and Harris County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivens-Baker Jr v. Riley
as 4:2022cv02462
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker Jr
Defendant:
J. Riley, A. Boyd, Herra John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Davis et al
as 4:2022cv03205
Plaintiff:
Garyoine L. Dorsey
Defendant:
Davis and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Green et al
as 4:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Keith Gardner
Defendant:
Sgt. Bradshaw Green and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivens-Baker Jr v. Larue et al
as 4:2022cv02480
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker Jr
Defendant:
J. Larue, James Lambert, Jr., Fomijang Claude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. Ms. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Julio A Zuniga
Defendant:
Ms. Mitchell, Bridgette Hayes, Willie Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv02431
Plaintiff:
Jalil Rajaii Floyd
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, exec. Director Bryan Collier, Warden Nicole Sandifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poledore v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv01863
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Poledore
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, Supervisor John Doe and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Director of TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2022cv01718
Plaintiff:
Kourton Williams
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ-CID, Michael Butcher, Unit Grievance Coordinator - Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
