Cases 41 - 50 of 164
Rodriguez v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv03217
Respondent:
Warden Joe Smith, Attorney General William Barr and Donald W Washington
Petitioner:
Edward Adam Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Epley v. Luong D.D.S. et al
as 3:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Tawana Lakesha Smith, MD, Wanda T. Hilliard, APRN, Julia Renee Ward, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Epley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennemer v. Danzy et al
as 3:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Justin C Opara, Adam M Gonzales, Kurtis D Pharr and others
Plaintiff:
John David Kennemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Davis
as 4:2019cv04948
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Keith Scatterwater, Texas DNA Mixture Project, Randi Capone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2019cv03533
Defendant:
Dr C Adams, Grievance Operation, K Frazer and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Hudson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Collier et al
as 4:2019cv03263
Defendant:
Lieutenant Marlen Marquez, Captain Carolyn A Pansy, Correction Officer V Aaron E Ripkowski and others
Plaintiff:
William Kelly Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2019cv02541
Respondent:
Captain Adewa, Office Board, T. CoIII and others
Petitioner:
Isaac Hudson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Lawson et al
as 4:2019cv01935
Respondent:
Tanya Lawson, Erick Echavarry and Isaac Kwartency
Petitioner:
Earnest Dwight Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anson v. McClane et al
as 4:2019cv01123
Plaintiff:
James W Anson, II
Defendant:
Mrs. Hyde, Adam McClane, Amber Golsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Jacquelin Brown, Zulema Calderon and others
Petitioner:
Adam Walker Wayne
Plaintiff:
Adam Wayne Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
