Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00223
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grove v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv01570
Petitioner: Frederick Grove
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Crumbley v. Quarterman. DO NOT DOCKET IN H-08-791. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER H-07-563.
as 4:2008cv00791
Petitioner: Frederick Jerome Crumbley
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv03760
Petitioner: Frederick Dean Lane
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Owens
as 6:2007cv00089
Petitioner: Frederick W Patterson
Respondent: Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massey v. Perez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00319
Petitioner: Frederick Massey
Respondent: O Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santee v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv01808
Petitioner: Frederick Lee Santee
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv01103
Petitioner: Frederick Dean Lane
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick v. State of Texas: TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2007cv00946
Plaintiff: Joe Frederick
Defendant: State of Texas: TDCJ-CID, Nathaniel Quarterman, Vernon Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crumbley v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00563
Petitioner: Frederick Jerome Crumbley
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?