Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Cole v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 4:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Luther Elvis Cole
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. San Jacinto County District Attorney(s) et al
as 4:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
Richard Cole
Defendant:
San Jacinto County District Attorney(s), San Jacinto District Attorney Todd Dillon, San Jacinto County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. City of Rockport et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Steven Cole Hunt
Defendant:
City of Rockport, Aransas County and Sheriff Bill Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v Aransas County, et al
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Steven Cole Hunt
Defendant:
Aransas County and Bill Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03107
Petitioner:
Richard Cole
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole Sr. v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02657
Petitioner:
Gary Anthony Cole Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole v. Davis et al
as 4:2021cv03050
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr.
Defendant:
L Davis, Bobby Lumpkin and Correctional Officer Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv01987
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Gary Anthony Cole, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01043
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Cole v. Gonzalez
as 4:2021cv00373
Petitioner:
Devin Paul Cole
Respondent:
HCSO Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
