Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Skinner v. Bowman et al
as 4:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Jessie P. Skinner
Defendant:
Jevon Bowman, C. Alexander, James Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weigel v. Gray et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
James Allan Weigel
Defendant:
Lori Chambers Gray, Jason Cox and Mark Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Choyce v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv02788
Plaintiff:
Clifton Choyce
Defendant:
Jason E. Williams, Robert Keller, Jesus F. Soqui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Choyce v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Clifton Choyce
Defendant:
Jason E Williams, Robert Keller, J Soqui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harmon v. Coleman et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
R. Coleman, Barbara Kent, Rachael Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Corr Health et al Case electronically transferred to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division.
as 3:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Rafer E. Bowman
Defendant:
Corr Health, Angellica Gay, Manard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv01364
Defendant:
Sheri Banton, Bobby Lumpkin, Tawn A Kent and others
Plaintiff:
David T. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thacker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv00363
Petitioner:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. McMahan et al
as 4:2020cv04004
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Thompson
Defendant:
Major J Wade, Captain J. McMahan, Assistant Warden J. Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
