Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Villasana, III v. Rivera et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Audencio G Villasana, III
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Rivera, Sgt. Brenda Unknown, Corporal Unknown Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villanueva-Navarro v. Head, et al
as 4:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
Francisco Villanueva-Navarro
Respondent:
Warden, George Head and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Navarro-Galves v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2022cv00150
Petitioner:
Franklin Navarro-Galves
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Spann v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Sgt. Navarro, C.O. Menchaca, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Spann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 6:16-cr-89-00001.
as 6:2019cv00078
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Navarro
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Irsan et al v. Navarro
as 4:2019cv02210
Plaintiff:
Khaled Azzeh and Nasim Irsan
Defendant:
Navarro and Harris County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. The County Court at Law of Navarro County TX et al. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 4:2017cv02862
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Bell
Respondent:
The County Court at Law of Navarro County TX and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reyes-Navarro v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00034
Petitioner:
Aurelio Reyes-Navarro
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hess v. Navarro
as 1:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
Scott Hess
Defendant:
David Navarro, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. Davis
as 2:2016cv00370
Petitioner:
Oscar Mario Navarro, Jr.
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
