Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Riley v. Linthicum et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Josh Randall Riley
Defendant:
Lanette Linthicum, Richard Lu, Alexander Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivens-Baker v. Riley et al
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr
Defendant:
J Riley, Warden R. Boyd, Captain Herra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogus v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Brett David Bogus
Defendant:
Bobbie Lumpkin, Bryan Collier, Joe Freudenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rivens-Baker Jr v. Riley
as 4:2022cv02462
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker Jr
Defendant:
J. Riley, A. Boyd, Herra John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv01088
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Sr. Warden Jeffery S. Richardson, Assistant Warden Terry W. Burson and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Douglas Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lincoln v. Harris County Sheriff's Office/Health Systems et al
as 4:2020cv04207
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt L. Lincoln
Defendant:
Precinct 4 Constable Riley, Constable Precinct 4 Officer 2, Constable Precinct 4 Officer 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Reed et al DO NOT DOCKET. Case electronically transferred to the USDC, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division.
as 4:2020cv04381
Defendant:
Bruce Johnson, Terry Andrews, Jessica Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Warden Riley et al
as 3:2020cv00166
Defendant:
TDCJ - ID, TDCJ and Warden Riley
Plaintiff:
Lowell E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vallejo v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00147
Petitioner:
Riley Rene Vallejo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Riley v. Livingston
as 4:2014cv02392
Plaintiff:
Elliott Riley
Defendant:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
