Cases 1 - 10 of 498
Adams v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Adams
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tretter v. Fiesta Stores et al
as 4:2024cv03064
Defendant:
Mr Irving and Fiesta Stores
Plaintiff:
Wayne C. Tretter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McDonald v. Landry et al
as 4:2024cv03030
Plaintiff:
Kenard Wayne McDonald, Jr
Defendant:
Ms. Smith, G. Landry, Ms. K. Whright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. TDCJ Director
as 4:2024cv03041
Defendant:
TDCJ Director
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv02958
Defendant:
Kristen Worman, Bruce Fredricks, TX Board ATX Call J3-Unit and others
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02878
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Donnelly v. 249th District Court, Guinn Justice Center et al
as 4:2024cv02819
Defendant:
District Clerk David R. Lloyd, Connie Longoria, 249th District Court, Guinn Justice Center and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Fredricks et al
as 4:2024cv02676
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Kim, W Orphry, FNU Onwukne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tretter v. Ed Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv02504
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Wayne C. Tretter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
